Haag’s forensic engineers, forensic architects, and building consultants conducted a comprehensive investigation, despite joining the case years after initial investigations by others.
Our team:

• Visually inspected all 250 buildings, documenting conditions across the development.
  observed destructive testing, moisture probe tests, and remediation in progress on several representative buildings.
• Reviewed nearly a decade of raw data previously collected by others, which allowed a comprehensive analysis of opposing experts’ investigational methods.
• Applied GIS-based overlays to visualize patterns in the multi-faceted data, revealing confirmation bias inherent to the opposing expert’s methodology.
• A detailed review of applicable investigational standards further revealed multiple violations of these standards within the opposing expert’s work product.
• Conducted statistical analysis to assess the validity of the opposing expert’s conclusions. This revealed significant errors in the data presentation and interpretation, undermining the credibility of their recommendations.
• Re-analyzed field evidence to determine actual causes of damage, which were unrelated to the allegations.